TCLKIT-WIN32.UPX.EXE DOWNLOAD

A starpack would be a tclkit and application, frozen into a single file. As of , the most recent manually-built kits are 8. Am I missing a shared library somewhere? This is due to the fact that each version info is contained twice, once as binary number and once as string. The point of all this? Sometimes I want to share one of my programs with someone, almost invariably someone who doesnt' know anything about Tcl and I say: On this version of Windows if an executable located on a remote drive is run, the user will be presented with a warning dialog.

Uploader:	Tajar
Date Added:	3 June 2017
File Size:	57.92 Mb
Operating Systems:	Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X
Downloads:	40603
Price:	Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]

If your application is to be a console mode application then use tclkitsh instead of tclkit as the executable and be aware that you cannot pass the same executable as the argument for -runtime as you are running. tclkit-win32.upx.dxe

Though I still think that TixTclKit kicks some considerable ass. What might cause a segfault on Linux SuSE 8.

I never saw an extended explanation, but certainly you have provided an example of the problem. On this version of Windows if an executable located on a remote drive is run, the user will be presented with a warning dialog. For instance, the tkchat application tclkit-wkn32.upx.exe a tclkit. When I run tclkit-win32.upxe.xe code in tclsh ActiveTcl 8. I can shove all that in one file and ship it to people. Two files either way.

SDX under Windows

Okay, that's how things work on Unix This ensures that those libraries that are needed by image are present. I then type the command again. Can anyone replicate this error on Linux?

I am not arguing against ActiveTcl. On Windows, this step will create an additional file called example.

Creating Standalone Tcl/Tk Applications

I don't know about you, but not too tclkit-win3.2upx.exe of my programs consist of a single. Another project produces a binary called dqkit. Even with single scripts, I often use starkits to get extra compression. A simple way to handle this is to create a simple batch file to handle this, for instance sdx. I see that the arguments are doing me no good in cmd.

This gives us a vfs directory with two files. But packing the resulting label simply resulted in an empty window.

I was, however, able to get the starkit in which I was interested to run using the ActiveTcl 8. It creates an empty correctly-named.

My test program is as follows:. I just noticed a message in the Metakit mailing list archives about this problem.

Creating Standalone Tcl/Tk Applications

You might also like to look at ezsdx - a small frontend for sdx which offers a few interesting features.: Documentation Tclkit Documentation information about tclkits as well as pointers to other useful pages of information Building Tclkit Tclkit solves problems a magazine article that introduces uses of Tclkit, and especially its VFS capabilities, as a deployment solution.

If you don't have access to a particular platform consider using the KitCreator nightly builds. Tclkit is a basekit that contains exactly the following packages: This note is an expansion on a communication from JCW to me tomk that helps explain the situation. However, the ActiveState downloads seem to all be for installers for different platforms, and I'm trying to build Starpacks for multiple platforms from a Windows machine, so they're not really useful for me.

One tclkit-win32.upx.ex is a GUI mode program and the other tclkitsh is a console mode program. What's the best way to obtain an ActiveTcl basekit? The way in that Tclkit resolves paths is not well documented.